The age of the stadium can be appealing if the stadium is rich with history, or if it is new and equipped with the most modern features. However, middle-aged stadiums may have neither appeal and could result in depressed attendance figures. The number of wins that the team has in the season impacts fan interest, as does the team's salary (which is a good way to operationalize a team's star power).
Each of these variables is already quantified, so is fully operationalized. This avoids the trap of using spurious proxies in a study. There are three possible outcomes that can result from this research. The null hypothesis can be proven within significant confidence limits or it may be disproved. The third option is that the null hypothesis may be proven, but there is reason to suspect that some of the variables are closely related to one another and that this has an impact. For example, it is possible that while both salary and wins are shown to be correlated with attendance, that this is only because they are strongly correlated with one another. Thus, the third option is that evidence may be found of cross-correlations that casts doubt about the findings that either support or fail to support the null hypothesis.
The level of measurement for the age of the stadium will be years. One year will be used as the scale, as partial years are significant in assets that could be decades old. The level of measurement for the teams' salaries will be millions of dollars...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now